Jupiter; Song 3: Charlie
Alright, back to work. This track is the first song on Stadium Arcadium to have strong funk elements, and in fact the Chili Peppers haven’t been THIS funky (in the traditional sense, if we’re talking about bass being in the forefront and tight, syncopated guitar rhythms etc) since "Right on Time" on Californication all the way back in 1999. Lyrically a tribute to the imagination, “Charlie” is made up of three main parts, a verse, chorus and a bridge. The verse and chorus are nice counter-sections in that they explore different aspects of funk, the verse coming from a dark place whereas the chorus is somewhat sunny and joyful. I guess another way to put it is the verse is to rhythm as the chorus is to melody, and as such this song best encapsulates the far and recent pasts of Red Hot Chili Peppers, which to me is one of the major themes of the album.
In guitar magazines, much has been said of the influence of Brandy (the American RMB singer slash star of “Moesha”) on John Frusicante’s song-writing, with regards to rhythm styles and rhythmic interactions with melody, and this can be heard in this song, particularly in the verse where the guitar can be heard filling the spaces left by the vocal melody.
Also of note are the back up vocals, which wisely have been wrestled from being a purely John domain as they were in By The Way. I myself like John Frusciante’s trademark falsetto harmonies but Anthony’s rhythmic blasts, particularly in this piece and “Storm in a Teacup” (coming up in a few months) make for a more diverse vocal soundscape, and I imagine will let Flea go nuts with back up vocals when the Chili Peppers play live.
So that’s Charlie. I should probably comment on the new Red Hot Chili Peppers video clip for Tell Me Baby, which according to Flea is "the best video of our career" (http://www.redhotchilipeppers.com/news/journal.php?uid=241). The clip for “Tell Me Baby” is once again directed by Jonathon Dayton and Valerie Faris who have a long association with Red Hot Chili Peppers, and is one of the few clips to have any direct association with the lyrical content of the piece (for example "Californication", also by Dayton & Faris), as we see in the intro several young Americans voicing their hopes and dreams to “make it” in Los Angeles, like the girl in the song “giving up all the innocence you left behind.” When you take this into account, as well as the fact that it’s a party song and the cast of the clip are clearly having fun, I feel that the video is a good visual interpretation of what makes the song special. And shit, I’d do anything to have partied with the band in the last shot of the clip.
Alright, back to work. This track is the first song on Stadium Arcadium to have strong funk elements, and in fact the Chili Peppers haven’t been THIS funky (in the traditional sense, if we’re talking about bass being in the forefront and tight, syncopated guitar rhythms etc) since "Right on Time" on Californication all the way back in 1999. Lyrically a tribute to the imagination, “Charlie” is made up of three main parts, a verse, chorus and a bridge. The verse and chorus are nice counter-sections in that they explore different aspects of funk, the verse coming from a dark place whereas the chorus is somewhat sunny and joyful. I guess another way to put it is the verse is to rhythm as the chorus is to melody, and as such this song best encapsulates the far and recent pasts of Red Hot Chili Peppers, which to me is one of the major themes of the album.
In guitar magazines, much has been said of the influence of Brandy (the American RMB singer slash star of “Moesha”) on John Frusicante’s song-writing, with regards to rhythm styles and rhythmic interactions with melody, and this can be heard in this song, particularly in the verse where the guitar can be heard filling the spaces left by the vocal melody.
Also of note are the back up vocals, which wisely have been wrestled from being a purely John domain as they were in By The Way. I myself like John Frusciante’s trademark falsetto harmonies but Anthony’s rhythmic blasts, particularly in this piece and “Storm in a Teacup” (coming up in a few months) make for a more diverse vocal soundscape, and I imagine will let Flea go nuts with back up vocals when the Chili Peppers play live.
So that’s Charlie. I should probably comment on the new Red Hot Chili Peppers video clip for Tell Me Baby, which according to Flea is "the best video of our career" (http://www.redhotchilipeppers.com/news/journal.php?uid=241). The clip for “Tell Me Baby” is once again directed by Jonathon Dayton and Valerie Faris who have a long association with Red Hot Chili Peppers, and is one of the few clips to have any direct association with the lyrical content of the piece (for example "Californication", also by Dayton & Faris), as we see in the intro several young Americans voicing their hopes and dreams to “make it” in Los Angeles, like the girl in the song “giving up all the innocence you left behind.” When you take this into account, as well as the fact that it’s a party song and the cast of the clip are clearly having fun, I feel that the video is a good visual interpretation of what makes the song special. And shit, I’d do anything to have partied with the band in the last shot of the clip.

15 Comments:
"Lyrically a tribute to the imagination"
Doesn't 'Charlie' have some connotations to crack/cocaine.....????
"“Charlie” is made up of three main parts, a verse, chorus and a bridge."
The only part I really like is the bridge/extended outro.
What the hell is all that 'tick, tick tick tick, woop woop woop woop' stuff?? I'm sorry, but I can't stand that bit - it ruins the whole song for me!
This one is a skipable: 2/5
It's like Margaret and David at the movies.
According to the album commentary, Charlie is a metaphor for one's imagination, although Kiedis opened it up enough to invite people to make their own opinion, eg Charlie could be a girl or a drug etc
"It's like Margaret and David at the movies."
Shotgun David!!
(Actually, Nitch should be David cos he actually knows what he's talking about - I'll be feeble Margaret who just goes on gut feeling; "Errr, I liked it! Errr, I hated it!"
"syncopated guitar rhythms"
Actually, can you explain what that means? Cos according to Pandora, I really like 'mild rhythmic syncopation'.......except I have no idea what it is!!!
"According to the album commentary"
Huh???
Was this part of the 'Super Fun Happy Box of goodness'??
Syncopation is playing off the beat, or the major accented notes of a piece are not played in time with the beat. Its a technique used in basically all music so its not really a unique parameter, I'd be more surprised if someone had a preference more music on the beat, although I guess techno fits into THAT category.
"Huh??? Was this part of the 'Super Fun Happy Box of goodness'?? "
But of course!
the hell tommy...
What the hell is all that 'tick, tick tick tick, woop woop woop woop' stuff?? I'm sorry, but I can't stand that bit - it ruins the whole song for me!
thats the fucking funniest bit ever in the song!!! still best album of there career
What about waltzes? I like waltzes.
P.S Should I buy this CD, or will it make me dpressed?
Always a fan of the non-use of word verification
can you please do a review on that song 'download this song' by MC fuckface...
Girls Aloud...hottest female band out there...oh yeh!
ok. so it's agreed. shaun wont be allowed to comment on here again.
back to the matter at hand.
Tom, i have to join the others in disagreeing with you. the 'tick tick, woop woop' stuff is the essence of many a chili pepper song. what i mean is keidis and co's ability to have fun with words and use the voice as another instrument and not just a tool for telling the story.
Nitch, didn't you say you were going to do TWO reviews this weekend????
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
NAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, I dunno - I just don't like it - I think it sounds stupid and it annoys me!
"is the essence of many a chili pepper song"
Like.............?? Examples?
It's not that I'm opposed to jibberish funnies, in fact, I agree with what you say and I think it can be mad funnies - sometimes.
i.e. in 'Around the World', I like it when he goes "Ning nang nong nong ning nang nong...."
or the jibberish line in 'One Big Mob' "Ek bala mala"
But just in this particular instance.......I reckon it sounds feeble!
So, should I buy this CD?
Nobody has provided any coherent reasoning!
"oli said...
So, should I buy this CD?
Nobody has provided any coherent reasoning!"
Well, you have to wait until the end of Nitch's rigourous reviewing process to be fully informed - and going at this rate, that should be in about.....oh, 5-10 months!!!!
I can lend you the goodness if you want - then you can make your own mind up if you want to invest in purchasing your own shiny new copy.
But methinks that if you are of the opinion (as I am) that the RHCP reached their illustrious peak in the 90's with their BSSM and Californication efforts, then you may not be too disgruntled with giving Stadium a miss (or mad burning it good!).
There'll be two posts to make up for it this weekend, I promise.
hahaha
"It stinks, it stinks, it stinks"
"Yes Mr Sherman, everything stinks."
Yeah, I thought Californication would have been the perfect time for them to hang up their undies and leave quietly.
"Hey Moe I thought you said this venue could hold 500."
"It did, last night."
"We want Chilly-Willy."
having actually started listening to teh album more properly now
i can comment on the songs a bit more!!!
i actually like this song...for me, the verse didnt do much for me....but i love the chorus for its catchiness and its overall....just its a really good feel good chorus...like makes u go awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
and the breakdown bit is aweosme i reckon
Post a Comment
<< Home